A forward deployed engineer on every project

The engineer who learns your codebase on day one — and never leaves.

A forward deployed engineer embeds with your team, reads your system, and works to your standards. Corporate AI 365 does that on every project you run — taking the request, diagnosing it against your own code, managing the work, and carrying it through your approval gates to release.

No credit card  ·  Your code is never hosted here  ·  No path to a live database

Manager Console — Payments platform
12
OPEN ISSUES
3
AWAITING YOU
1.8d
AVG TO RESOLVE
Approve release to Production
2 services · 6 files · staging → production
Awaiting
Staging
web · api · schema
CI passing
Team delivery this sprint
74%

One loop, closed

Every change your business asks for — understood, built, governed and proved. Then the loop comes round, and the next one starts from a system that already knows what just shipped.

The Corporate AI 365 delivery loop Six stages in a continuous cycle: understand your codebase, capture a request, diagnose it, plan and work it, govern and release it, then prove it shipped — after which the loop begins again. AI does the work. Your people keep the decisions. 1 Understand We read your codebase and schema 2 Capture Anyone reports the problem 3 Diagnose The cause, and the fix 4 Plan and work Boards, sprints, owners, live conversation 5 Govern and release QA, approval, promotion 6 Prove Your CI confirms it shipped
  1. 1
    UnderstandWe read your codebase and schema
  2. 2
    CaptureAnyone reports, in plain language
  3. 3
    DiagnoseThe cause, and the change to make
  4. 4
    Plan and workBoards, sprints, owners, live conversation
  5. 5
    Govern and releaseQA, approval, promotion across environments
  6. 6
    ProveYour CI confirms it. The evidence is kept
  7. And round againThe next request starts from a system that knows what just shipped
Cloud codebase connectors

It works with the code host you already use

Connect in a click. Every connector sits behind one interface, so diagnosis, the fix pipeline and promotion behave identically whichever you run — and adding the next one changes nothing about how you work.

GitHub

Cloud and Enterprise Server

GitLab

SaaS and self-managed

Bitbucket

Cloud workspaces

Azure DevOps

Organisations and projects

More coming

New connectors appear here

Database structure comes in the same way — a schema export you run yourself. No connection string, ever.

Built for the whole company, not just engineering

A console for every role

The person reporting a problem, the developer fixing it, the tester verifying it and the manager answering for it need different things. Each gets their own screen — and only what their permissions actually open.

Employee Support Portal

Report it the way you'd say it

No ticket taxonomy, no severity matrix, no asking a colleague which team owns what. Someone in finance describes what went wrong in their own words and the system classifies and routes it. They can see where it got to without chasing anyone.

  • Plain-language reporting, with screenshots attached
  • AI classifies and routes to the right team
  • Live status, and the conversation attached to it
Employee Support Portal
The invoice screen stops loading after I pick a supplier…
Submit report Attach
#418
Invoice screen freezes
Routed to Finance Systems · 2h ago
In progress
#402
Export missing last column
Fixed and released · yesterday
Resolved
Developer Tools

Start from the answer, not the search

The queue arrives already diagnosed: the file, the class, the line, and a proposed change taken verbatim from your repository. The developer's job becomes judging a fix rather than hunting for a cause — and the branch and pull request are opened for them.

  • File · class · line, with a confidence score
  • Side-by-side original and proposed code
  • Real branches and pull requests on your own repository
Developer Tools — Issue #418
0.95 confidence
ProductsController.cs · Create() · line 29
Null reference when the supplier lookup misses.
27var supplier = _db.Suppliers 28 .FirstOrDefault(s => s.Id == dto.SupplierId); 29model.Name = supplier.Name; // supplier may be null 30_db.Products.Add(model);
Push to dev Send to QA
QA gate

A queue of what is ready to test

QA works through issues, not commits. Each one arrives with what was reported, who fixed it, which environment it is sitting in, and whether the build passed — read back from your own CI rather than asserted by us. Pass sends it for approval; fail returns it to development with the reason attached to the issue.

  • Issues ready to verify, with priority and environment
  • Build status read back from your CI
  • Fail returns it to development with the reason recorded
  • The code change is one click away when you want it
QA — verification
High
#418 · Invoice screen freezes
Fixed by A. Rahman · staging · ready to verify
CI passing
Medium
#431 · Duplicate refund on retry
Fixed by S. Kaur · staging · ready to verify
CI passing
Low
#402 · Export missing last column
Returned to development · reason recorded
QA failed
QA pass QA fail View the change
Manager Console

Approve a change, not a status

Today a manager approves a word. Here they approve a diff — what will actually move, in which repositories, into which environment. Everything below it is visible too: what is open, what is late, and how the team is performing on real delivery data rather than on recollection.

  • The release payload, before you authorise it
  • Every decision recorded — who, when, and why
  • Face Off scoring on delivery data, with an AI umpire
Manager Console
12
OPEN ISSUES
3
AWAITING YOU
1.8d
AVG TO RESOLVE
Approve release to Production
2 services · 6 files · staging → production
Review
Team delivery this sprint
74%

One place for the whole delivery cycle

From the moment someone reports a problem to the moment it reaches production — with a record of who decided what.

AI root cause

Reasons over your ingested code and database objects to pinpoint the exact location, with a confidence score and a suggested fix.

Governed pipeline

Developer → QA → approval → production. Every gate is a permission, every transition an audit record.

Environments

Dev, staging and production as real branches. Promote between them, see the payload first, and undo a whole release as one pull request.

Face Off

Compare developers, departments or employees on real delivery data, with an AI umpire verdict.

Structure in, data out

It reads your code — never your customers' data

Connect a repository and Corporate AI 365 ingests the source and your scripted database objects. It never connects to a live database. When live data is genuinely needed, the AI writes a read-only query for your own developer to run.

  • One-click connect to your code host — pick a repo, it becomes a project
  • Answers are cached against a code snapshot, so the same issue gives the same answer
  • Side-by-side original and proposed code, taken verbatim from your repository
1
Connect a repository
Authorise GitHub, choose a repo
2
Someone reports an issue
Plain language — no technical knowledge needed
3
AI pinpoints the cause
File, class, line, and a proposed fix
4
The fix travels the gates
Developer → QA → approval, with real branches and pull requests
5
Your CI/CD deploys
Production is always reached by a merged pull request
Roles you define
Compose any role from 41 permissions — "Release Manager" works on day one
Your real org chart
Group → Division → Department → Team, and a division head sees everything beneath
People wear several hats
Developer in IT and Manager in Finance — both apply
Verified domain join
Prove your domain by DNS and let staff join themselves
Fits your company, not the other way round

Configured, not customised

Most tools assume your company looks like the one they were built for. This one is opinionated about how work flows and configurable about who does it. Build your own roles, model your own hierarchy, and invite staff, contractors or clients — each classified so you always know who is internal.

  • Sign in with Microsoft, Google or GitHub — no new passwords
  • Every screen and action gated on permissions, enforced server-side
Face Off

See exactly who is performing, and who is holding things up

Every person, team and department, scored on what they actually delivered.

1st
Payments team
4 developers
88/ 100
Fastest to resolve
2nd
Platform team
6 developers
74/ 100
Steady
3rd
Integrations
3 developers
52/ 100
Work is queueing

Umpire verdict

Integrations is the bottleneck. Same issue count as Platform, 2.4× longer to close, and 4 of 9 fixes came back from QA. The time is lost waiting for handover, not in development.

Developers Employees Teams Departments Scored from work already done — no timesheets

Start free. Pay when it earns its place.

Every account begins on a fourteen-day trial with the full product. No card, no sales call.

START HERE

Trial

The whole product, for two weeks. Every account begins here.
Free

14 days · no card, no sales call

  • 5 users, 1 project
  • AI included — no provider key needed
  • 2M AI tokens
  • Read-only after 14 days, never deleted
Start free

Business

Growing teams running real production support.
$595 per quarter

$198 a month, billed quarterly · excl. tax

  • 50 users, 5 projects
  • 20M AI tokens a month, or bring your own key
  • Full Face Off and analytics
  • Your logo and colours
Start free, then upgrade

Enterprise

Larger organisations with their own requirements.
$1,795 per quarter

$598 a month, billed quarterly · excl. tax

  • Unlimited users and projects
  • 100M AI tokens a month, and model choice
  • SSO, audit logs and integrations
  • Dedicated support with an SLA
Talk to sales

Every plan includes

  • AI root cause — file, class and line
  • Governed pipeline with real Git operations
  • Dev, staging and production environments
  • Release promotion and one-click revert
  • Connectors for every major cloud code host
  • Consoles for employee, developer, QA, manager
  • Task management and live conversation
  • Your code never hosted, no live database access

Prices are exclusive of tax. Applicable VAT or GST is added at checkout based on your billing country. Billing is handled by our payment provider as merchant of record.

Questions worth asking

Do you read our production database?

No, and there is no code path that could. Corporate AI 365 reasons over source code and scripted database objects only. If live data is genuinely needed to diagnose something, the AI writes a read-only query for your own developer to run.

Can it change our code without us knowing?

No. It opens branches and pull requests, and production is only ever reached by a merge that your own approver authorises. Your branch protection, reviews and CI still apply — the product fits into your governance rather than bypassing it.

Why do you need a work email?

Your company domain is how we group your team, let colleagues join, and tell staff apart from external guests. That does not work on a personal mailbox — so trials start from a work address.

What happens when the trial ends?

Your account becomes read-only — nothing is deleted and you keep access to everything you created. Pick a plan whenever you are ready and it unlocks immediately.

Do we need our own AI provider key?

Not for the trial — AI is included. On paid plans you can use the platform quota or bring your own key, whichever suits your procurement.

See it against your own code

Connect a repository, report one real issue, and judge it by whether the answer points at the right line.

Start your free trial Sign in